Table of Contents
Preface Main Page
Foreword


Part 1 The Negotiating Context
1. The Climate Change Problem
2. The Climate Convention
and the Kyoto Protocol
3. The Bodies in the Regime
4. The Rules of Procedure
5. State and Non-State Actors
6. Coalitions in the Climate
Change Regime
7. The G-77 and China

Part 2 Negotiating Skills
8. The Ideal Negotiator
9. The Handicapped Negotiator
10. Coping Strategies
11. Tips and Tricks for the
Lonely Diplomat
12. Index to the FCCC
13. References




Part II: Negotiating Skills
10. Coping Strategies
Filling a hollow mandate / Coping with handicapped negotiating power / Coping with handicapped negotiating power: Strategies / Drafting / Submitting / Speaking / Tips and tricks

10.4 Drafting

Negotiators never draft in a vacuum except in the early stages of a negotiation. In general the drafting skills must take the national/regional position and the consolidated negotiating text as a basis.

If the negotiating text is overwhelming: first select all text related to the negotiating position, directly or indirectly. It is on these textual items that the negotiator needs to have a position and draft text. Where the material is neutral the negotiator may wish to ignore it. Where the text goes against the basic position of the negotiator, he or she may need to have alternative drafts ready for the negotiating process.


It is critical to have good drafting skills. There are no quick ways to learn such skills. However, it is important to keep in mind that there should be a combination of:

  • Innovative, problem solving text (i.e., new ideas, new options) to move the process further

  • Repetition of existing text in the FCCC/KP/COP decisions to avoid re-negotiation of the already agreed text.

    In drafting, it is important to understand the connotations of specific words (especially in English, since the bulk of the informal negotiations take place in English). There is a hierarchy of words. "Shall" and "decides" are stronger than "should," "may," "recommends," "invites," etc. The effect of strong words in a legally binding document is very high.

    It is not enough to draft; one needs to lobby for the draft, circulate drafts and test and improve the language until it gains acceptance amongst coalition partners. Such papers can be circulated informally in corridors, or formally to the sessions of the groups. Then it needs to be officially submitted to the Secretariat.