Table of Contents
Preface Main Page
Foreword


Part 1 The Negotiating Context
1. The Climate Change Problem
2. The Climate Convention
and the Kyoto Protocol
3. The Bodies in the Regime
4. The Rules of Procedure
5. State and Non-State Actors
6. Coalitions in the Climate
Change Regime
7. The G-77 and China

Part 2 Negotiating Skills
8. The Ideal Negotiator
9. The Handicapped Negotiator
10. Coping Strategies
11. Tips and Tricks for the
Lonely Diplomat
12. Index to the FCCC
13. References




Part I: The Negotiating Context
6. Coalitions in the Climate Change Regime
The importance of coalitions / The two major negotiating blocs (power-based coalitions) / The divisions within the blocs (issue-based and political) / The divisions across the groups in Non-Annex I / The divisions across the blocs / Tips and tricks

6.1 The importance of coalitions

The climate change negotiations take place among 194 countries. It is impossible to negotiate with each country individually. This means that countries try to develop coalitions with other countries. Such coalitions are necessary to make the negotiations manageable, to reduce the complexity of the issues and the numbers of negotiating groups. Further, such coalitions can reduce transaction costs for countries by helping them to pool their resources and increase their negotiation leverage. Coalitions can be used to put issues on the agenda, to negotiate a point of view, and to modify or break a consensus. Coalitions can be power-based (e.g., G-77 versus non-G-77; see Section 7), issue-specific (e.g., Alliance of Small Island States ­ AOSIS), institutionalized or formal (e.g., the European Union ­ EU), political or constructed (e.g., JUSSCANNZ). The disadvantages of coalitions is that although in theory one has the flexibility to manoeuvre in different groups, in practice it is very difficult to move out of a specific coalition.